Supreme Court to review federal home distilling ban
What each leads with
NBC News ↗ — Headline uses pun "High spirits" and opens with "boost for those who want to make whiskey in their bathtubs or gin in their kitchens"; Emphasizes removal of criminal sanctions (up to $10,000 fine and five years) and personal stories of challengers like Scott McNuttNBC News — Headline uses pun "High spirits" and opens with "boost for those who want to make whiskey in their bathtubs or gin in their kitchens"; Emphasizes removal of criminal sanctions (up to $10,000 fine and five years) and personal stories of challengers like Scott McNutt
Washington Examiner ↗ — Lede stresses "weighing whether it oversteps the federal government’s powers" and case name "Department of Justice v. Scott McNutt"; Quotes solicitor general on the law’s "venerable history and commonsense rationale" and frames issue as limits of enumerated powersWashington Examiner — Lede stresses "weighing whether it oversteps the federal government’s powers" and case name "Department of Justice v. Scott McNutt"; Quotes solicitor general on the law’s "venerable history and commonsense rationale" and frames issue as limits of enumerated powers
High spirits: Supreme Court to decide fate of federal ban on home distilling
The Supreme Court announced it will consider whether to strike down a longstanding federal ban on distilling spirits at home.
Supreme Court takes up challenge to 160-year-old ban on distilling alcohol at home
The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear a challenge to a federal law barring the distilling of alcohol at home, weighing whether it oversteps the federal government’s powers. The high court said in an orders list released Monday morning that it will take up Department of Justice v. Scott McNutt for oral arguments […]