Lindsay Clancy retrial developments and juror statements
What each leads with
CBS News ↗ — Headline and lede center on attorney’s claim of “no evidence” Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids; body details motion for required finding of not guilty and quotes Reddington asking “Where is…; Excerpt notes prior statements where defense offered to stipulate culpability, highlighting the shift in argumentCBS News — Headline and lede center on attorney’s claim of “no evidence” Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids; body details motion for required finding of not guilty and quotes Reddington asking “Where is…; Excerpt notes prior statements where defense offered to stipulate culpability, highlighting the shift in argument
Daily Mail ↗ — Headline leads with “prosecutors weigh retrial as holdout juror begs public to ‘put the focus on the three angels’”; body opens with undecided retrial and juror’s statement; Excerpt emphasizes DA’s review process and next hearing date without detailing defense motion argumentsDaily Mail — Headline leads with “prosecutors weigh retrial as holdout juror begs public to ‘put the focus on the three angels’”; body opens with undecided retrial and juror’s statement; Excerpt emphasizes DA’s review process and next hearing date without detailing defense motion arguments
Attorney says there's "no evidence" Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids
In a surprising turn in Lindsay Clancy's first hearing since her mistrial in early September, her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued that there was no evidence she killed her kids.
Lindsay Clancy prosecutors weigh retrial as holdout juror begs public to 'put the focus on the three angels'
Prosecutors in Massachusetts have not yet decided whether they will force Lindsay Clancy to stand trial a second time for killing her three children.