Lindsay Clancy defense argues lack of evidence in child killings case
What each leads with
CBS News ↗ — Headline and lede stress "no evidence she admitted to killing children"; Body excerpt repeats the defense claim without further details on investigationCBS News — Headline and lede stress "no evidence she admitted to killing children"; Body excerpt repeats the defense claim without further details on investigation
Daily Mail ↗ — Headline calls it a "stunning argument" of "NO EVIDENCE she killed her three children"; Excerpt quotes "Where is the evidence that she did this?" and notes claims of no blood on socks and no investigationDaily Mail — Headline calls it a "stunning argument" of "NO EVIDENCE she killed her three children"; Excerpt quotes "Where is the evidence that she did this?" and notes claims of no blood on socks and no investigation
Lindsay Clancy defense now says there's no evidence she admitted to killing children
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued in court Tuesday that there's no evidence Lindsay Clancy admitted to killing her children. CBS News' Shanelle Kaul and Caroline Polisi have more.
Lindsay Clancy's defense makes stunning argument there is NO EVIDENCE she killed her three children as retrial hangs in the balance
The mom-of-three returned to court for the first time since her high-profile murder case ended in a controversial mistrial earlier this month.